On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 08:11:11PM +0100, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 06:27:58PM +0000, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
> > > - don't require texinfo-tex, tex-preview (#431516)
>
> Note also that tex-preview is not in any way implicated in BZ #431516,
> and so removing the tex-preview requires is a little odd. Unless
> there's something I am missing about 431516.
Both packages were creating dependency loops:
tex-preview->texlive-latex->texlive-texmf-latex->texlive-texmf->tex-preview
texinfo-tex->tetex->texlive->texlive-texmf->texinfo-tex
Dependency loops are not an issue, the Requires(.) should lead to the
correct ordering.
--
Pat