Thanks Adam, that was the reference I was looking for.
Cheers,
Tim
----- Original Message -----
From: "Adam Williamson" <awilliam(a)redhat.com>
To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
<devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 8, 2014 1:39:41 PM
Subject: Re: libev - bundling - "expected"
On Wed, 2014-01-08 at 13:09 -0500, Tim St Clair wrote:
> Greetings folks -
>
> It appears that I've run into a conundrum: libev upstream developer(s)
> actually encourage (re)bundling of libev, see -
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049554
>
> I was wondering if there was president for how to handle *this. In
> groking the code, it's not run-time configurable, but alas it's a
> dependency on one of my packages.
The bundling policy has an exception for 'copylibs', which *may* apply
here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries#Copylibs
this is the clause you would need to check to see if your case matches
it.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
--
devel mailing list
devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct:
http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct