On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 06:14:30PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
Doesn't look too bad ;) judging based on very brief look at the
spec file,
but it violates the Static Library Packaging Guidelines, and I wonder
who "owns" %{_datadir}/re?
I've removed the static library and made the package an explicit owner
of %{_datadir}/re.
> %{_libdir}/libre.so
A version-less library is less than ideal, however. How stable is the API/ABI?
Yeah, that's my feeling, too, but that's what the upstream Makefile
currently produces. I wasn't sure how invasive I should be in terms
of patching the upstream build process.
--
Lars Kellogg-Stedman <lars(a)redhat.com>