I'm not sure if you mean the latest 2.4 kernel from
kernel.org, or the
latest Fedora Core/1 kernel... The patch I've posted/forwarded is NEWER
than the one in Fedora's 2.4.22-1.2149.nptl kernel.
Keyspans' latest patch includes changes made in Sep. 2003...
-RZ
On Thu, 2004-01-22 at 15:56, Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 10:24:30PM -0800, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Jan 2004 22:39:10 -0600
> Randy Zagar <jrzagar(a)cactus.org> wrote:
>
> > The attached patch files include changes to the kernel-2.4.spec file and
> > a patch file from the vendor:
> >
> >
http://www.keyspan.com/support/linux/files/currentversion/patch/
>
> I always turn such things down unless there's an overriding reason to
> include them. Every patch, no matter how correct or benign, adds maintenance
> burden. IMHO, it is even more justified in case of Fedora, because of
> Fedora's short release cycle.
>
> The correct way to handle this patch is
> 1) to identify a champion for the issue. Sometimes it's a user, but
> often a vendor. If Keyspan cannot be arsed to
> perform the rest of the steps, users have to step in.
> 2) to file upstream, in this case linux-usb-devel
I'm pretty sure this change is already in the latest 2.4 kernel. Randy,
can you verify this?
If not, I really need to know.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
Randy Zagar <jrzagar(a)cactus.org>
Capital Area Central Texas Unix Society