-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
David Nielsen wrote:
2009/6/19 Peter Robinson <pbrobinson(a)gmail.com>
>
> mono-tools-2.4.2-1.fc12
>> -----------------------
>> * Tue Jun 09 2009 Paul F. Johnson <paul@all-the-
johnsons.co.uk> -
2.4.2-1
>> - Bump to 2.4.2 preview 1
>> - Add support for ppc and ppc64
>> - Add label for udev-acl
>>
>>
> is there any reason why mono doesn't use the 0.x revision
tags for
> alpha/beta/RC releases like everyone else?
>
Plenty of projects fall outside that naming scheme, it's
unfortunate but
that is life. Maybe upstream will consider your thoughts on
the matter if
you bring them to their attention.
- David
This is not an upstream issue, but a packaging one. Release:
0.x is how you should mark prereleases so that -1 is the actual
release.
Example:
kde-plasma-networkmanagement-0.1-0.12.20090519svn.fc11.x86_64
k-p-nm-0.1 can have a Release: 1 with this scheme.
- --Ben
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAko8DZoACgkQiPi+MRHG3qS77ACgtDdrNf+lo02KDHDT5QHov0Il
PygAnAkMp7Yi61+OKSHVCxhJexDymYcj
=PnQs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----