https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/1977
bchunk is said to be obsolete, because "shntool" (also in Fedora) would be superior. If you disagree and find a good reason to adopt bchunk, please find a solution for the open ticket.
Originally, I had sponsored Alan Olson (alano) when he wanted to take over this old package in Fedora. A deal that hasn't worked out this time. The single bugzilla ticket (#439661)is without a response/action since over a year. And attempts at contacting alano via private mail and bugzilla have been fruitless. As such, I've removed him from the FAS Packager group, too.
On Tuesday 14 July 2009 03:56:34 am Michael Schwendt wrote:
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/1977
bchunk is said to be obsolete, because "shntool" (also in Fedora) would be superior. If you disagree and find a good reason to adopt bchunk, please find a solution for the open ticket.
Originally, I had sponsored Alan Olson (alano) when he wanted to take over this old package in Fedora. A deal that hasn't worked out this time. The single bugzilla ticket (#439661)is without a response/action since over a year. And attempts at contacting alano via private mail and bugzilla have been fruitless. As such, I've removed him from the FAS Packager group, too.
From reading the ticket[0], it looks like the Debian patch solves the issue --
I would like to take the package.
[0]: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439661
Regards,
On Tue, 14 Jul 2009 12:30:03 -0700, Conrad wrote:
From reading the ticket[0], it looks like the Debian patch solves the issue -- I would like to take the package.
You will need the help of somebody with admin powers to give you ownership in pkgdb and a releng request to bring back bchunk in koji dist-f12 (the reverse of releng ticket 1977).