Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, 02.08.10 17:01, Mike Prispan
(fr.prop(a)gmail.com)
wrote:
> Hi all,
> maybe I'm wrong (I guess I
am), but is
PulseAudio really dead? What lead
> me to this conclusion?
Well look at this:
> * Fedora has 201 NEW/ASSIGNED bugs right now [1]
>
* there was not fixed a single bug last six months (since 2010-02-23)
>
[2][3] * there are not only "not pulseaudio, but alsa
is broken" bugs,
>
for example abrt reported crashes
> No development, no bug fixing,
hard to say if there are any comments from
> bug assignee(s) at all. I've
checked only a few bug and
did not find any,
> only from bug reporters
pinging or asking if more info is
required, but I
> did not check it
using bugzilla query (don't know if
it's possible at
again, is PulseAudio dead? Seems to me
No, it's not. I am just
pushing systemd through right now, and did other
stuff.
Also, check
upstream git to figure out whether a project is dead. The
last commit
there is from 2 weeks ago. Git can tell you
something about
whether
development happens. Bugzilla just tells you whether I
have
devoted my
life to processing bug reports. And well, I
haven't done
that. Sorry
that I don't exclsuively spend my time on
making my stats on
bugzilla
look pretty. If I did, then I would not get any real
work done
anymore.
Most of the abrt stuff can probably be merged as duplicates.
I'd welcome
if somebody wants to go through this and do this.
BTW,
would be cool to direct flamewar-inducing mails like this to me
directly, first. Unless of course you think flamewars are a
good thing,
not a bad thing.
Lennart
Well, i'm happy to be a bug triager so
you can get "real work" done. /s
Let me know if you need some help to
make the stats looks pretty.