On Thu, 2008-03-27 at 09:05 -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 9:01 AM, Shawn Starr <sstarr(a)platform.com>
wrote:
Well, you might know the history, but A lot of newcomers to
Linux don't. It's nice and dandy to change things and I fully
agree that we shouldn't be beholden to the FHS structure.
So in your estimation, LSB compliance isn't worth keeping?
Oh cmon - that's a false dichotomy.
it's not one or the other.
You can not be beholden to the fhs and maintain lsb compliance with a
small set of symlinks.
c'mon jeff. You know better than that.
-sv