Something is very broken with the buildsystem, rel-eng's procedures or bodhi.
Both packages have been built either days ago or earlier today:
--- Package: perl-ExtUtils-AutoInstall-0.63-6.fc8 Tag: dist-f8 Status: complete Built by: corsepiu ID: 17859 Started: Wed, 05 Sep 2007 07:03:10 MST Finished: Wed, 05 Sep 2007 07:11:31 MST ---Package: perl-Set-IntSpan-1.12-1.fc8 Tag: dist-f8 Status: complete Built by: corsepiu ID: 18195 Started: Sun, 09 Sep 2007 22:00:37 MST Finished: Sun, 09 Sep 2007 22:04:27 MST
Ralf
On 10/09/2007, Ralf Corsepius rc040203@freenet.de wrote:
Something is very broken with the buildsystem, rel-eng's procedures or bodhi.
Both packages have been built either days ago or earlier today:
[snip]
perl-ExtUtils-AutoInstall FE6 > F7 (0:0.63-6.fc6 > 0:0.63-5.fc6)
Note that this is even more broken: it's about a Fedora 7 package being out-of-date, but the EVR given has an FC6 tag!
On Mon, 2007-09-10 at 16:18 -0400, Michel Salim wrote:
On 10/09/2007, Ralf Corsepius rc040203@freenet.de wrote:
Something is very broken with the buildsystem, rel-eng's procedures or bodhi.
Both packages have been built either days ago or earlier today:
[snip]
perl-ExtUtils-AutoInstall FE6 > F7 (0:0.63-6.fc6 > 0:0.63-5.fc6)
Note that this is even more broken: it's about a Fedora 7 package being out-of-date, but the EVR given has an FC6 tag!
Was the package ever rebuilt for F7? ISTR that not all of them were. That makes it possible for a package with a 'fc6' tag to show up in F7. It looks like 0.63-6 was built and pushed out on FC6 before the updated version on F7 got pushed into updates/updates-testing.
Jeff
On Mon, 2007-09-10 at 15:25 -0500, Jeffrey C. Ollie wrote:
On Mon, 2007-09-10 at 16:18 -0400, Michel Salim wrote:
On 10/09/2007, Ralf Corsepius rc040203@freenet.de wrote:
Something is very broken with the buildsystem, rel-eng's procedures or bodhi.
Both packages have been built either days ago or earlier today:
[snip]
perl-ExtUtils-AutoInstall FE6 > F7 (0:0.63-6.fc6 > 0:0.63-5.fc6)
Note that this is even more broken: it's about a Fedora 7 package being out-of-date, but the EVR given has an FC6 tag!
Was the package ever rebuilt for F7?
Package: perl-ExtUtils-AutoInstall-0.63-6.fc7 Tag: dist-fc7-updates-candidate Status: complete Built by: corsepiu ID: 17860 Started: Wed, 05 Sep 2007 07:04:50 MST Finished: Wed, 05 Sep 2007 07:10:14 MST
Ralf
On Mon, 2007-09-10 at 22:28 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On Mon, 2007-09-10 at 15:25 -0500, Jeffrey C. Ollie wrote:
On Mon, 2007-09-10 at 16:18 -0400, Michel Salim wrote:
On 10/09/2007, Ralf Corsepius rc040203@freenet.de wrote:
Something is very broken with the buildsystem, rel-eng's procedures or bodhi.
Both packages have been built either days ago or earlier today:
[snip]
perl-ExtUtils-AutoInstall FE6 > F7 (0:0.63-6.fc6 > 0:0.63-5.fc6)
Note that this is even more broken: it's about a Fedora 7 package being out-of-date, but the EVR given has an FC6 tag!
Was the package ever rebuilt for F7?
Package: perl-ExtUtils-AutoInstall-0.63-6.fc7 Tag: dist-fc7-updates-candidate Status: complete Built by: corsepiu ID: 17860 Started: Wed, 05 Sep 2007 07:04:50 MST Finished: Wed, 05 Sep 2007 07:10:14 MST
And push request'ed:
corsepiu has submitted a new update for Fedora 7
================================================================================ perl-ExtUtils-AutoInstall-0.63-6.fc7 ================================================================================ Release: Fedora 7 Status: pending Type: bugfix Submitter: corsepiu Submitted: 2007-09-05 16:26:09
Ralf
On Mon, 10 Sep 2007 22:29:28 +0200 Ralf Corsepius rc040203@freenet.de wrote:
And push request'ed:
corsepiu has submitted a new update for Fedora 7
================================================================================ perl-ExtUtils-AutoInstall-0.63-6.fc7 ================================================================================ Release: Fedora 7 Status: pending Type: bugfix Submitter: corsepiu Submitted: 2007-09-05 16:26:09
You neither pushed it to Testing nor stable.
perl-ExtUtils-AutoInstall-0.63-6.fc7 [ Push to Testing | Push to Stable | Delete | Edit ]
On Mon, 2007-09-10 at 16:38 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Mon, 10 Sep 2007 22:29:28 +0200 Ralf Corsepius rc040203@freenet.de wrote:
And push request'ed:
corsepiu has submitted a new update for Fedora 7
================================================================================ perl-ExtUtils-AutoInstall-0.63-6.fc7 ================================================================================ Release: Fedora 7 Status: pending Type: bugfix Submitter: corsepiu Submitted: 2007-09-05 16:26:09
You neither pushed it to Testing nor stable.
I don't know if I pushed this package to stable or not, or if I lost in the bodhi's usability swamp.
But then you also might be able to explain this:
perl-Set-IntSpan F7-updates > F8 (0:1.12-1.fc7 > 0:1.11-1.fc7)
Package: perl-Set-IntSpan-1.12-1.fc8 Tag: dist-f8 Status: complete Built by: corsepiu ID: 18195 Started: Sun, 09 Sep 2007 22:00:37 MST Finished: Sun, 09 Sep 2007 22:04:27 MST
This is FC8 - my built predates your complaint by almost a day.
Ralf
On Mon, 10 Sep 2007 23:05:36 +0200 Ralf Corsepius rc040203@freenet.de wrote:
On Mon, 2007-09-10 at 16:38 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Mon, 10 Sep 2007 22:29:28 +0200 Ralf Corsepius rc040203@freenet.de wrote:
And push request'ed:
corsepiu has submitted a new update for Fedora 7
================================================================================ perl-ExtUtils-AutoInstall-0.63-6.fc7 ================================================================================ Release: Fedora 7 Status: pending Type: bugfix Submitter: corsepiu Submitted: 2007-09-05 16:26:09
You neither pushed it to Testing nor stable.
I don't know if I pushed this package to stable or not, or if I lost in the bodhi's usability swamp.
But then you also might be able to explain this:
perl-Set-IntSpan F7-updates > F8 (0:1.12-1.fc7 > 0:1.11-1.fc7)
Package: perl-Set-IntSpan-1.12-1.fc8 Tag: dist-f8 Status: complete Built by: corsepiu ID: 18195 Started: Sun, 09 Sep 2007 22:00:37 MST Finished: Sun, 09 Sep 2007 22:04:27 MST
This is FC8 - my built predates your complaint by almost a day.
rawhide was composed from the dist-rawhide tag, not dist-f8. Basically, I think this was held up by the test2 freeze.
josh
On Mon, 2007-09-10 at 16:09 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Mon, 10 Sep 2007 23:05:36 +0200 Ralf Corsepius rc040203@freenet.de wrote:
On Mon, 2007-09-10 at 16:38 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Mon, 10 Sep 2007 22:29:28 +0200 Ralf Corsepius rc040203@freenet.de wrote:
And push request'ed:
corsepiu has submitted a new update for Fedora 7
================================================================================ perl-ExtUtils-AutoInstall-0.63-6.fc7 ================================================================================ Release: Fedora 7 Status: pending Type: bugfix Submitter: corsepiu Submitted: 2007-09-05 16:26:09
You neither pushed it to Testing nor stable.
I don't know if I pushed this package to stable or not, or if I lost in the bodhi's usability swamp.
But then you also might be able to explain this:
perl-Set-IntSpan F7-updates > F8 (0:1.12-1.fc7 > 0:1.11-1.fc7)
Package: perl-Set-IntSpan-1.12-1.fc8 Tag: dist-f8 Status: complete Built by: corsepiu ID: 18195 Started: Sun, 09 Sep 2007 22:00:37 MST Finished: Sun, 09 Sep 2007 22:04:27 MST
This is FC8 - my built predates your complaint by almost a day.
rawhide was composed from the dist-rawhide tag, not dist-f8. Basically, I think this was held up by the test2 freeze.
Great, ... :/
in other words, the freeze breaks rawhide?
Ralf
On Mon, 10 Sep 2007 23:44:51 +0200 Ralf Corsepius rc040203@freenet.de wrote:
This is FC8 - my built predates your complaint by almost a day.
rawhide was composed from the dist-rawhide tag, not dist-f8. Basically, I think this was held up by the test2 freeze.
Great, ... :/
in other words, the freeze breaks rawhide?
Or it means you didn't follow the freeze process. Again.
josh
On Mon, 2007-09-10 at 16:52 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Mon, 10 Sep 2007 23:44:51 +0200 Ralf Corsepius rc040203@freenet.de wrote:
This is FC8 - my built predates your complaint by almost a day.
rawhide was composed from the dist-rawhide tag, not dist-f8. Basically, I think this was held up by the test2 freeze.
Great, ... :/
in other words, the freeze breaks rawhide?
Or it means you didn't follow the freeze process. Again.
C'mon, what you say is really ridiculous and embarrassing.
Nothing (neither CVS, nor bodhi, nor koji) prevented me (nor anybody else amongst the dozens of other folks having done the same) from submitting, building nor pushing packages ...
So I conclude, you actually mean bodhi's unusability and rel-eng's broken procedures start to show effect ... as usual during the final phases of release preps. You simply deny the brokenness of your procedures.
Ralf
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 00:05:52 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On Mon, 2007-09-10 at 16:52 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Mon, 10 Sep 2007 23:44:51 +0200 Ralf Corsepius rc040203@freenet.de wrote:
This is FC8 - my built predates your complaint by almost a day.
rawhide was composed from the dist-rawhide tag, not dist-f8. Basically, I think this was held up by the test2 freeze.
Great, ... :/
in other words, the freeze breaks rawhide?
Or it means you didn't follow the freeze process. Again.
C'mon, what you say is really ridiculous and embarrassing.
Nothing (neither CVS, nor bodhi, nor koji) prevented me (nor anybody else amongst the dozens of other folks having done the same) from submitting, building nor pushing packages ...
So I conclude, you actually mean bodhi's unusability and rel-eng's broken procedures start to show effect ... as usual during the final phases of release preps. You simply deny the brokenness of your procedures.
Ralf,
http://katzj.livejournal.com/405215.html
;)
On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 00:14 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 00:05:52 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On Mon, 2007-09-10 at 16:52 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Mon, 10 Sep 2007 23:44:51 +0200 Ralf Corsepius rc040203@freenet.de wrote:
This is FC8 - my built predates your complaint by almost a day.
rawhide was composed from the dist-rawhide tag, not dist-f8. Basically, I think this was held up by the test2 freeze.
Great, ... :/
in other words, the freeze breaks rawhide?
Or it means you didn't follow the freeze process. Again.
C'mon, what you say is really ridiculous and embarrassing.
Nothing (neither CVS, nor bodhi, nor koji) prevented me (nor anybody else amongst the dozens of other folks having done the same) from submitting, building nor pushing packages ...
So I conclude, you actually mean bodhi's unusability and rel-eng's broken procedures start to show effect ... as usual during the final phases of release preps. You simply deny the brokenness of your procedures.
Ralf,
Well, at least a glimpse of insight ...
... leaves the immaturity of the infrastructure which pees at volunteers by sending unjustified complaints, if you want to have it "bluntly".
Ralf
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On Mon, 2007-09-10 at 16:52 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
Or it means you didn't follow the freeze process. Again.
C'mon, what you say is really ridiculous and embarrassing.
Nothing (neither CVS, nor bodhi, nor koji) prevented me (nor anybody else amongst the dozens of other folks having done the same) from submitting, building nor pushing packages ...
So I conclude, you actually mean bodhi's unusability and rel-eng's broken procedures start to show effect ... as usual during the final phases of release preps. You simply deny the brokenness of your procedures.
If we're talking about freeze, we're talking about rawhide, and if we're talking about rawhide, we're NOT talking about bodhi. At all. Bodhi isn't involved in rawhide, so you can stop beating that old drum. Bodhi didn't eat the curtains, and its kitten consumption is pretty minimal for a Fedora product.
Jima
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 08:38 -0500, Jima wrote:
At all. Bodhi isn't involved in rawhide, so you can stop beating that old drum.
Try "new packages" in bodhi and you will find fc8 packages.
I'm aware of this; IIRC it's due to the way that bodhi looks up packages against koji. Alas, do you see "Rawhide" or "Fedora 8" anywhere in the "Release" drop-down on the "New update" page? I don't. Mainly because rawhide updates don't go through bodhi; they get pushed directly.
Jima