Dne 02. 02. 20 v 13:13 Mattia Verga via devel napsal(a):
I don't have enough competence to start such a big project, but
if
anyone is interested I could give a hand.
People are asking for this for years. No one ever had time to do this. This make you most
competent guy :) Just do it.
We (the Copr team) had some plans to run rpmlint/rpminspect after build. For those people
who are interrest in that. I
am interrested in integration with the tool you are suggesting.
And it is probably good idea to build the package in Copr which allows reviewer to simply
enable the Copr project and
install the results to test if it actually works.
Additionally, build in Copr last longer than scratch builds in Koji.
BTW I think that any ticket with a last changed date before 2016
should
be closed to do some cleanup: there are tickets never reviewed, as well
as tickets approved and never imported in git or (the worst cases)
packages approved and imported in repositories, but whose tickets were
never closed...
I had an time of life when I pick up the oldest tickets. Yes, some of them were dead, but
surprisingly large amount of
people was glad that I picked it up. I finished one review which was 7 years old and
staled for 6 years.
Instead of automatic actions I prefer to ping the people at least twice. With a month
grace period and only then close
the ticket.
There is always some human behind the ticket and some non-trivial amount of work. Just
closing it can be perceived as
rude by some people.
--
Miroslav Suchy, RHCA
Red Hat, Associate Manager ABRT/Copr, #brno, #fedora-buildsys