On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 11:00 AM, Marcela Mašláňová <mmaslano(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 02/24/2014 08:57 PM, drago01 wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Marcela Mašláňová <mmaslano(a)redhat.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> WG meeting will be at 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting on Freenode.
>>
>> == Topic ==
>> # additional repository
>> fedora-{incubator,ugly}
>> * better name than ugly based on content of repo
>> * github-like frontend for copr
>> * discuss policies/procedures for accepting copr repo
>
>
> Just a note maybe how multilib is handled by those repos should be
> discussed. coprs lack of multilib support is already causing problems
> for people trying out the gnome 3.12 test repo.
> We probably should use mash to compose them to make them really
> "compatible" with how we do things in the main repo.
>
> (Not sure I will be there for the meeting time so dropping the comment
> here).
> _______________________________________________
> env-and-stacks mailing list
> env-and-stacks(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/env-and-stacks
>
If user decide to build only for x86_64, you can't even have multilib
problem ;-) Or do you mean different issue?
Sure you can if someone installs from the repo and have i686 versions
of a library installed.
Ex:
User has:
libfoo-1.0.i686
libfoo-1.0.x86_64
installed
Repo ships libfoo-1.1.x86_64
=> User can't install it => problem ;)