Am 26.07.2013 00:48, schrieb Eric Smith:
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Reindl Harald
<h.reindl(a)thelounge.net> wrote:
> Am 26.07.2013 00:22, schrieb Eric Smith:
>>>> I wouldn't run *anything* in production on Fedora 17. That's what
the
>>>> downstream "enterprise" distributions are for.
>>>
>>> We've been through this rodeo a few days ago. There's a solid body
of
>>> opinion that your statement is going too far. Many of us run
>>> 'production' systems of various types on Fedora. (All of
>>>
happyassassin.net runs on Fedora, FWIW).
>>
>> And what are you going to do for security updates on Fedora 17? Live
>> without? Backport and rebuild everything yourself?
>
> what are you talking about?
>
> [harry@srv-rhsoft:~]$ date
> Fr 26. Jul 00:33:37 CEST 2013
>
> Reminder: Fedora 17 end of life on 2013-07-30
>
> my calendar says that we are before EOL as well as upgrade
> of the 20 servers is scheduled for next week and since the
> internal deadline for PHP 5.4 rollout is on monday i would
> like to know what your problem is
So if someone came to you today asking whether they should use Fedora
17 on their production servers, you would say yes?
Bizarre
*where did i say this*
i said we run *currently* F17 and if you would read careful
you have noticed the "Apache 2.4" which was never shipped
for F17
i really do not justify my decisions inside support cycles
because *you* quote out of context and sound like "booh nobody
is running Fedora in production" because *that* is bizarre with
a @foedraproject.org address
-------- Original-Nachricht --------
Betreff: Re: RFC: Proposal for a more agile "Fedora.next" (draft of my Flock
talk)
Datum: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 16:04:11 -0600
Von: Eric Smith <brouhaha(a)fedoraproject.org>
An: Development discussions related to Fedora <devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org>
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl(a)thelounge.net> wrote:
if that would be the case i would not run Apache 2.4, and Zend
Opcache
in production on Fdora 17
I wouldn't run *anything* in production on Fedora 17. That's what the
downstream "enterprise" distributions are for.
-------- Original-Nachricht --------
Betreff: Re: RFC: Proposal for a more agile "Fedora.next" (draft of my Flock
talk)
Datum: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 20:57:45 +0200
Von: Reindl Harald <h.reindl(a)thelounge.net>
Am 25.07.2013 20:53, schrieb drago01:
> i saw a lot of (successful) competitors come and go in the
> past 10 years in case of our business and if we would have
> followed them bldindly we would have gone down the same way
There is a difference between "follow blindly" and bury your head in the sand
.
You seem to pretty much always opt for the later when someone mentions
the competition
if that would be the case i would not run Apache 2.4, and Zend Opcache
in production on Fdora 17