On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 12:25:27 -0800, Carl wrote:
The rasmol source has a dual GPLv2/RASMOL license, so for Fedora we
can
consider that it is licensed gplv2. There are some libraries that are
included that are licensed lgpl.
This is covered by:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#Mixed_Source_...
Clearly, the finished rasmol binary is
gplv2
The binary does not override the licensing of the source files it
was built from. The licensing does not only apply to the binary but
to the software as a whole.
If some of the source files use a less restrictive licensing scheme,
such as the LGPL, Fedora's current licensing guidelines want you to
specifiy that with and "AND" in the License tag.