On Mon, 2005-04-18 at 18:31 -0700, Michael A. Peters wrote:
On Mon, 2005-04-18 at 19:21 -0300, Steven Garrity wrote:
> Marius Andreiana wrote:
> > Anyway, eog is only 600k. It doesn't worth discussing/arguing about it.
> > If some people want it, let it be and let's move to next :-)
>
> Good point. However, it's not just a matter of disk space. It also means
> one more item in the "Graphics" menu - which is a bigger deal.
Yeah - I mean there's four items in my menu, it's so confusing!
Is one of them actually Eye of Gnome? Here's a snippet from the spec
file (yanked from the cvs repo):
%prep
%setup -q
echo "NoDisplay=true" >> eog.desktop.in
Eye of Gnome certainly doesn't seems to show up in my desktop menu, so
it doesn't seem to add much to the clutter.
For now, I think eog actually fills a need as a quick image previewer.
(Oh yes, it deals with SVG files as well, which is sort of useful.) At
some point maybe Evince will turn into a universal document viewer and
in that case perhaps eog can be ditched but right now it seems to be
worth keeping.
Per
--
Per Bjornsson <perbj(a)stanford.edu>
Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Applied Physics, Stanford University