Dne 27.7.2017 v 16:56 Martin Langhoff napsal(a):
Turns out that Elixir should not be noarch, as some of its code is
endianness specific. What's best practice to switch away from noarch
for packages in current Fedora? How about EPEL?
I see this outdated and unresolved Packaging Comittee
issue...
https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/117
and I see a bunch of bugs referring to specs (and rpms) that fail
during upgrades. Some have obsoletes on their own name, others don't.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753149
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230183
This was related to rubygem-bson and I switched the rubygem-bson from
noarch to arch in this commit:
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/rubygem-bson.git/commit/?id=f507f...
I don't think there should be any additional concern ATM.
Vít
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301306
Is there clarity / consensus on this? Any packages that have made the
transition successfully recently?
cheers,
martin
--
martin.langhoff(a)gmail.com <mailto:martin.langhoff@gmail.com>
- ask interesting questions ~
http://linkedin.com/in/martinlanghoff
- don't be distracted ~
http://github.com/martin-langhoff
by shiny stuff
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org