Petr Machata <pmachata(a)redhat.com> a écrit:
The soname didn't change. I reviewed the actual changes using
abidiff,
and the only thing reported that I think is an actual ABI violation is
insertion of one virtual method. I don't think that's real however:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17861
Indeed, the reported insertion of the virtual method is a false positive
resulting from a bug in abidiff. I have committed a change to abidiff
that should fix that issue now. And I confirm that the other abi
changes reported by abidiff do not represent ABI-incompatible changes.
So the current plan is to simply update TBB and not even bump and
rebuild clients,
Assuming abidiff hasn't forgotten to report any ABI-incompatible change,
this should work, yes.
but if you could take your packages for a spin with the
scratch builds, and report back, that would be great.
Good plan.
Cheers.
--
Dodji