This is a report of the weekly KDE-SIG-Meeting with a summary of the
topics that were discussed. If you want to add a comment please reply
to this email or add it to the related meeting page.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
= Weekly KDE Summary =
Week: 19/2010
Time: 2010-05-11 14:00 UTC
Meeting page:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/KDE/Meetings/2010-05-11
Meeting minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-
meeting/2010-05-11/kde-sig.2010-05-11-14.02.html
Meeting log:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-05-11/kde-
sig.2010-05-11-14.02.log.html
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
= Participants =
* Jaroslav Reznik
* Kevin Kofler
* Rex Dieter
* Steven Parrish
* Than Ngo
* Thomas Janssen
* Lukas Tinkl
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
= Agenda =
* topics to discuss:
o Default install paths for apidocs
o Duplicate menu entries, e.g. #591089:
+ Do we consider these bugs?
+ Or do we want to follow upstream and keep the dupes where
upstream has them?
+ If we consider them bugs, do we want to fix these in updates?
Or only in new releases?
+ Do we want these to be blockers for F14? The GNOME folks
consider these release blockers.
o KDE SC 4.4.3 status
* recent bugs:
o (none)
= Summary =
KDE SC 4.4.3 status
* kde-l10n needs respin and build
* ACTION: ltinkl to respin and build kde-l10n and to prepare Bodhi update
Duplicate menu entries
* See [1], [2], [3]
o Do we consider these bugs?
o Or do we want to follow upstream and keep the dupes where upstream
has them?
o If we consider them bugs, do we want to fix these in updates? Or
only in new releases?
o Do we want these to be blockers for F14? The GNOME folks consider
these release blockers.
* AGREED: on Kevin Kofler's proposal - report upstream, follow upstream's
decision, don't treat it as a release blocker
Default install paths for apidocs
* we are inconsistent in apidocs directories naming and location
o soprano contains version, some apidocs are installed in doc/lib-
apidocs/, some doc/HTML/en/lib-apidocs
o we need consistent naming and common install location
+ AGREED: apidocs not to be installed to version specific
directories
+ AGREED: on adapting to KDevelop needs, rdieter to check it
* final decision postponed to next meeting
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
= Next Meeting =
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/KDE/Meetings/2010-05-18
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
= Links =
[1]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591089
[2]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591093
[3]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591097
--
Jaroslav Řezník <jreznik(a)redhat.com>
Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems Brno
Office: +420 532 294 275
Mobile: +420 602 797 774
Red Hat, Inc.
http://cz.redhat.com/