On Sun, Oct 05, 2008 at 10:49:22AM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Sun, 2008-10-05 at 16:06 +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> A review for the sake of a rename seems a complete waste of time to me.
> I won't rename it, then, the benefits are not worth the costs.
The review gives us an opportunity to ensure that the package hasn't
drifted too far from it's original state when it was first brought in,
and it gets a second pair of eyes on the proper setup of
Provides/Obsoletes, which can go wrong and often does. Since we have no
other formal re-review system, renames offer a little bit toward that.
I don't need a rereview of this package, currently. It is a (rather)
unusual package, and I'd prefer if reviewer interested in TeX/LaTeX used
their time differently, we seem to be very few in fedora, since reviewing
it carefully is certainly very time-consuming.
Given the vast number of improper Provides/Obsoletes I've ran
across, I
feel strongly that I'd like a second pair of eyes on any such additions.
Sure, but a re-review is much more than that.
--
Pat