Hi, we're following the policy for nonresponsive package maintainers again for bug 484855. There hasn't been any update on this breakage in the last 3 weeks.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484855
Thanks, Ricky
Ricky Zhou wrote:
Hi, we're following the policy for nonresponsive package maintainers again for bug 484855. There hasn't been any update on this breakage in the last 3 weeks.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484855
Thanks, Ricky
Is he not responding at Axel.Thimm@ATrpms.net?
Ricky Zhou wrote:
On 2009-07-08 12:30:30 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
Is he not responding at Axel.Thimm@ATrpms.net?
That's his bugzilla email addess, so that seems to be the case :-(
Thanks, Ricky
What about ixs@fedoraproject.org?
there are alot of bug report's and patch's waiting for Axel.Thimm
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 2:51 PM, Bill Nottinghamnotting@redhat.com wrote:
Jon Ciesla (limb@jcomserv.net) said:
Is he not responding at Axel.Thimm@ATrpms.net?
That's his bugzilla email addess, so that seems to be the case :-(
What about ixs@fedoraproject.org?
ixs@fp.o is not Axel. athimm@fp.o just goes to the ATrpms.net e-mail address.
Bill
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
On 08/07/09 18:51, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Jon Ciesla (limb@jcomserv.net) said:
Is he not responding at Axel.Thimm@ATrpms.net?
That's his bugzilla email addess, so that seems to be the case :-(
What about ixs@fedoraproject.org?
ixs@fp.o is not Axel. athimm@fp.o just goes to the ATrpms.net e-mail address.
Bill
Try a who is, it will give an extra addy.
Frank
Frank Murphy wrote:
On 08/07/09 18:51, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Jon Ciesla (limb@jcomserv.net) said:
Is he not responding at Axel.Thimm@ATrpms.net?
That's his bugzilla email addess, so that seems to be the case :-(
What about ixs@fedoraproject.org?
ixs@fp.o is not Axel. athimm@fp.o just goes to the ATrpms.net e-mail address.
Bill
Try a who is, it will give an extra addy.
Frank
Axel just replied to something from the axel.thimm@atrpms.net address on his own list today. Is it possible there is a routing issue or something? I will forward one of these mails to his mailing list perhaps he just isn't getting the messages.
Brent
On 2009-07-08 01:26:28 PM, Ricky Zhou wrote:
Hi, we're following the policy for nonresponsive package maintainers again for bug 484855. There hasn't been any update on this breakage in the last 3 weeks.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484855
Update on this, there was a response today at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484855#c32.
Thanks, Ricky