On Aug 15, 2011, at 10:07 AM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
On 08/15/2011 06:42 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> Does anybody know what's going on with this? Base perl has a sub package for
perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib (which gets its own version numbering). It seems to have been
there for quite a while.
>
> "Recently" (March of last year) perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib was brought in as
its own package (
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573929) but the existing sub
package was never removed, and exists to this day.
>
> Can somebody tell me what's going on here? Which one is the true package, which
one needs to go away?
>
> I care because now we have mismatched version numbers for this package, and it is
causing some interesting scenarios when trying to use Fedora repos as a koji external
repo. There may be more cases of this, I haven't done an exhaustive search.
>
> --
> Jesse Keating
> Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
> identi.ca:
http://identi.ca/jkeating
>
Updates of core modules were sometimes hard and we used this approach
few last releases:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Perl/updates#Updates_of_Perl_core_modules
It should be working in rpm, but I wasn't aware of koji problems.
I suppose that now we can live without dual life modules, because Perl
modules in core are updated more often. But I'd rather discuss it with
Perl SIG members before any action.
Upon further looking at the koji problem, these packages may not actually be causing my
root issue, since they do come from separate SRPMs. However I am curious if this strategy
has ever gone though the packaging committee, releng, or fesco.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca:
http://identi.ca/jkeating