On Fri, 2007-08-03 at 17:46 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Sat, 2007-08-04 at 02:55 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Brian Pepple wrote:
>
> > *
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureCodecBuddy - FESCo
> > approved this proposal.
> >
>
> I wish FESCo hadn't approved this. There is a lot of things being
> discussed in FAB list about this and Max Spevack was going to get legal
> to look into the questions raised there. From my understanding the
> package under review currently is not how we want this feature to work.
If you want this to work differently, better start working on an
alternative. Also look at the updated details on the feature page,
which take up some of the points raised in the fab discussion.
Hopefully the developers are watching/involved in the discussions.
We've also got John Poelstra watching both sides. These folks need to
make sure details and changes don't fall between the cracks and get
lost/behind schedule.
Bottom line is, the feature description (and resulting code) is going to
have to (re)conform to what Fedora's legal friends tell us is best.
Right?
- Karsten
--
Karsten Wade ^ Fedora Documentation Project
Sr. Developer Relations Mgr. |
fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
quaid.fedorapeople.org | gpg key: AD0E0C41
////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\