It sounds like the kernel is going to be using gcc 3.3 - just want to do a final check with everyone that it's OK to remove the gcc32 package from FC2.
-- Elliot At the School of Hard Knocks, tuition is always high.
On Tue, 2004-01-13 at 13:14, Elliot Lee wrote:
It sounds like the kernel is going to be using gcc 3.3 - just want to do a final check with everyone that it's OK to remove the gcc32 package from FC2.
Negative captain, sparc needs it.
~spot --- Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa(a)redhat*com> LCA, RHCE Red Hat Sales Engineer || Aurora SPARC Linux Project Leader
"The author's mathematical treatment of the conception of purpose is novel and highly ingenious, but heretical and, so far as the present social order is concerned, dangerous and potentially subversive. Not to be published." -- Aldous Huxley's "Brave New World"
On Tue, 13 Jan 2004, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote:
On Tue, 2004-01-13 at 13:14, Elliot Lee wrote:
It sounds like the kernel is going to be using gcc 3.3 - just want to do a final check with everyone that it's OK to remove the gcc32 package from FC2.
Negative captain, sparc needs it.
Debian's using gcc-3.3 for sparc kernel builds now....
later, chris
On Wed, 2004-01-14 at 07:25, Chris Ricker wrote:
On Tue, 13 Jan 2004, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote:
On Tue, 2004-01-13 at 13:14, Elliot Lee wrote:
It sounds like the kernel is going to be using gcc 3.3 - just want to do a final check with everyone that it's OK to remove the gcc32 package from FC2.
Negative captain, sparc needs it.
Debian's using gcc-3.3 for sparc kernel builds now....
sparc64, not sparc32. I don't think Debian is doing any testing on sparc32 kernels.
~spot --- Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa(a)redhat*com> LCA, RHCE Red Hat Sales Engineer || Aurora SPARC Linux Project Leader
"The author's mathematical treatment of the conception of purpose is novel and highly ingenious, but heretical and, so far as the present social order is concerned, dangerous and potentially subversive. Not to be published." -- Aldous Huxley's "Brave New World"
On Tuesday 13 January 2004 21:14, Elliot Lee wrote:
It sounds like the kernel is going to be using gcc 3.3 - just want to do a final check with everyone that it's OK to remove the gcc32 package from FC2.
kernel-2.6.1-1.37 (todays latest) require gcc32 for sparc :)
I know that sparc/sparc64 is not aviable right now (is sheduled for FC2) but probably Tom "spot" will unhappy.
-------------------------------////------------------------------------> %ifarch sparc %define all_arch_configs kernel-%{kversion}-sparc*.config %define _64bit 0 # SMP is hosed for sparc in 2.6 right now... %define buildsmp 0 # We need to build the sparc kernel with gcc32 %define usegcc32 1 %endif ----------------------------///------------------------------------------->
My opinion/tests is that sparc64 is ok with gcc33 but sparc32 kernel not, maybe Tom tell more.
-- Elliot At the School of Hard Knocks, tuition is always high.
On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 09:34:05PM +0200, Balint Cristian wrote:
My opinion/tests is that sparc64 is ok with gcc33 but sparc32 kernel not, maybe Tom tell more.
But sparc32 cannot use gcc32 forever (at least I don't intend to maintain it that long, maybe others want). So, somebody needs to try gcc32 on sparc32, debug what's the problem and file small self-contained tests reproducing the problems (if any).
Jakub
On Wed, 2004-01-14 at 02:02, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 09:34:05PM +0200, Balint Cristian wrote:
My opinion/tests is that sparc64 is ok with gcc33 but sparc32 kernel not, maybe Tom tell more.
But sparc32 cannot use gcc32 forever (at least I don't intend to maintain it that long, maybe others want). So, somebody needs to try gcc32 on sparc32, debug what's the problem and file small self-contained tests reproducing the problems (if any).
I'm going to try and pin this down better, but in the meantime, it needs to stay... I don't want it around either. :)
~spot --- Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa(a)redhat*com> LCA, RHCE Red Hat Sales Engineer || Aurora SPARC Linux Project Leader
"The author's mathematical treatment of the conception of purpose is novel and highly ingenious, but heretical and, so far as the present social order is concerned, dangerous and potentially subversive. Not to be published." -- Aldous Huxley's "Brave New World"