Jeff Spaleta wrote:
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Carl Gaudreault
<carl.gaudreault(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>So It seems Carl G. has been closing several bugs across
multiple
>>components without comment recently. Hmm. Not cool.
>
> -jef
>
> I gave the reason why i closed it.
Are you saying that you comment in 27 requesting the report file a
report upstream bug in bug 531464 is meant to be taking as
rationale
for closing the fedora ticket as WONTFIX?
Its not clear from my reading of the comment that is your
intention.
Nor is it clear to me that this is an appropriate best practise to
do
in general even if this is what you intended. Doubly-so if the person
doing the closures isn't listed as a co-maintainer or an upstream
developer.
I certainly leave bugs in an open state until I or one of my
co-maintainers makes a judgement call which mandates a wontfix
resolution. This looks like a real issue..a tough one to track
down..but still potentially fixable. Neither cantfix nor wontfix seem
to apply... nor does notabug. There's nothing here in the
commentary
that suggests to me this is a wontfix situation if someone was able
to
provide an upstreamable patch that could be integrated into our
packages.
>
> Also, RHBZ number you are referring to?
Do you want a complete listing? I can talk to you about the
pattern
of behaviour offlist. I have concerns about some of your other
recent
wontifx/notabug closures. Your insufficient information closures
seem
to be reasonable as well as more than reasonably justified in the
comments.
-jef
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531464#c29
So It seems Carl G. has been closing several bugs across multiple
components without comment recently. Hmm. Not cool.
Are you talking about the other bug report related to Empathy i
reported months ago and was closed upstream? "several bugs
across multiple components".. sure ;)