Hello,
I am a bit annoyed by the location of the ltsp root directory, where the terminal nfs mounted root should be. Upstream contacted the lsb/fhs, and they responded that /tftpboot and a new top directory were wrong. He proposed /opt/ltsp and nobody complained.
It is not obvious, however that we should stick to that location in fedora. It should be mentioned that the directories in there are not part of a package, but they are installed by scripts that are in ltsp-server (under review).
Should we use /opt/ltsp or something else, like /var/lib/ltsp for the thin clients root directories?
-- Pat
On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 10:37:03AM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
Should we use /opt/ltsp or something else, like /var/lib/ltsp for the thin clients root directories?
My vote goes to /var/lib/ltsp. I don't see how /opt can be defended as a good choice.
On 10/19/07, Patrice Dumas pertusus@free.fr wrote:
Should we use /opt/ltsp or something else, like /var/lib/ltsp for the thin clients root directories?
/var/lib/ltsp seems like the obvious choice given the "no program should rely on a specific subdirectory structure" nature of /srv.