On Fri, 09 Sep 2016 17:54:07 -0700
Adam Williamson <adamwill(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
On Wed, 2016-09-07 at 10:44 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> Fedora Infrastructure currently maintains two sites for general open
> source code hosting:
fedorahosted.org and pagure.io.
>
>
Fedorahosted.org was established in late 2007 using Trac for issues
> and wiki pages, Fedora Account System groups for access control and
> source uploads, and offering a variety of Source Control Management
> tools (git, svn, hg, bzr). With the rise of new workflows and source
> repositories
fedorahosted.org has ceased to grow, adding just one
> new project this year and a handful the year before.
I'm replying here as I'm not subscribed to users@.
Pagure is fine for code projects, but we (still) use the fedora-qa
trac instance for tracking non-code-related activity, like arranging
Test Days. Is Pagure the recommended replacement for this kind of
purpose also? It doesn't feel right. If not, what is? Thanks!
Yes it is. At least I am planning on moving the trac's that I control
that do this sort of thing to pagure.
There's been a lot of improvement to pagure's issues of late and lots
of discussion of more. I think it meets the simple needs right now.
More complex workflows are under discussion still, so if you need them,
you might want to wait and/or join the discussion.
I'm likely to move infrastructure over very soon and perhaps a bunch
more of the smaller ones.
kevin