On 9/12/07, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Right to left as in random places? If so upstream needs to verify
the
licenses of these icons carefully.
We are both uncertain about the licensing right now. That's why I'm
asking on this mailing list.
It does not. However the other way around is possible. What problem
are
you trying to solve?
The problem I'm trying to solve is: which license should I use with
fedora's new licensing guidelines ?
On 9/12/07, Kevin Kofler wrote:
GPL->LGPL is not a valid conversion indeed.
Ok, for now I'll be using GPLv2.
It's more likely that the affected upstream projects either
aren't aware of
what's going on or don't really care about the license for something as simple
as an icon. Most likely both. Still, it's bad.
kmenu-gnome's upstream cares, but needs advice.
I'd say declare the license as GPL to be on the safe side. In
this context, it
probably doesn't make a real difference anyway. (How do you "link" a menu
icon?)
The icons are listed on the desktop files.
Chitlesh
--
http://clunixchit.blogspot.com