-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Seth Vidal wrote:
On Mon, 15 Jun 2009, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Seth Vidal wrote:
>
>> It's not about the upgrade process. It is only about
compare_providers.
>>
>> You have 3 pkgs providing 'foo'
>>
>> foo-1.1.noarch
>> foo-1.0.x86_64
>> foo-1.0.i386
>>
>> Which one do you pick on x86_64 or i686?
>>
>> We weight extra toward pkgs in the same arch as the running
system. And
>> then the arch NEAREST to the running arch.
>
> Maybe I'm just being naive, but I'd expect a newer EVR to
trump any
arch
> weighting.
really?
So if you're on x86_64
and you have foo-1.1.i386 and foo-1.0.x86_64
and you run:
yum install foo
you would expect foo-1.1.i386 to be installed instead of
foo-1.0.x86_64?
REALLY?
-sv
A special exemption for noarch in arch compares and version
differences? If it's between some arch and noarch, defer to the
version checker.
- --Ben
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEUEARECAAYFAko2oUMACgkQiPi+MRHG3qThCACgsf8PKu/aJKNw1KO7vvRkN3fL
KZAAl3gMbcnFvyfFykH3lUOLzzE0ndQ=
=B/QM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----