Are we going to see fc4 today ?
I've been checking slashdot/freshmeat/fedora.redhat.com and no sign of it.
On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 09:18:50AM -0400, seth vidal wrote:
Are we going to see fc4 today ? I've been checking slashdot/freshmeat/fedora.redhat.com and no sign of it.
10am EST - read the webpage.
^ D
:)
I grew up in Indiana, so I'm sensitive to this. :)
On Monday 13 June 2005 08:36, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 09:18:50AM -0400, seth vidal wrote:
Are we going to see fc4 today ? I've been checking slashdot/freshmeat/fedora.redhat.com and no sign of it.
10am EST - read the webpage.
^ D
Unfortunately our new dumbass governer wants us to go to daylight savings
On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 09:18 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 09:16 -0400, mbneto wrote:
Are we going to see fc4 today ?
I've been checking slashdot/freshmeat/fedora.redhat.com and no sign of it.
10am EST - read the webpage.
Ah, it should be EDT, I guess. And giving times in term of UTC would always be better.
So, it's really 14:00 UTC, less than thirty minutes from now.
roozbeh
On Monday 13 June 2005 06:37, Roozbeh Pournader wrote:
On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 09:18 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 09:16 -0400, mbneto wrote:
Are we going to see fc4 today ?
I've been checking slashdot/freshmeat/fedora.redhat.com and no sign of it.
10am EST - read the webpage.
Ah, it should be EDT, I guess. And giving times in term of UTC would always be better.
So, it's really 14:00 UTC, less than thirty minutes from now.
And now that it should be up, it looks like the updates tree is fubared for yum:
http://ftp.ussg.iu.edu/linux/fedora/linux/core/updates/4/x86_64/repodata/rep...: [Errno 4] IOError: HTTP Error 404: Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 14:20:11 GMT Server: Apache Content-Length: 258 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Trying other mirror. http://linux.admin.uillinois.edu/pub/linux/fedora/linux/core/updates/4/x86_6...: [Errno 4] IOError: HTTP Error 403: Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 14:20:11 GMT Server: Apache/2.0.46 (Red Hat) Content-Length: 360 Connection: close Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Trying other mirror. http://www.fedora.is/fedora/core/updates/4/x86_64/repodata/repomd.xml: [Errno 4] IOError: HTTP Error 404: Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 14:20:13 GMT Server: Apache/2.0.46 (Red Hat) Content-Length: 328 Connection: close Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Trying other mirror.
Etc. for about a dozen mirrors that I let it try.
David
Ah, it should be EDT, I guess. And giving times in term of UTC would always be better.
So, it's really 14:00 UTC, less than thirty minutes from now.
And now that it should be up, it looks like the updates tree is fubared for yum:
http://ftp.ussg.iu.edu/linux/fedora/linux/core/updates/4/x86_64/repodata/rep...: [Errno 4] IOError: HTTP Error 404: Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 14:20:11 GMT Server: Apache Content-Length: 258 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Trying other mirror. http://linux.admin.uillinois.edu/pub/linux/fedora/linux/core/updates/4/x86_6...: [Errno 4] IOError: HTTP Error 403: Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 14:20:11 GMT Server: Apache/2.0.46 (Red Hat) Content-Length: 360 Connection: close Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Trying other mirror. http://www.fedora.is/fedora/core/updates/4/x86_64/repodata/repomd.xml: [Errno 4] IOError: HTTP Error 404: Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 14:20:13 GMT Server: Apache/2.0.46 (Red Hat) Content-Length: 328 Connection: close Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Trying other mirror.
Well I think it needs to allow the mirrors to sync. I can get the isos from the main download.fedora.redhat.com so its out.
Pete
On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 07:22:28AM -0700, David Kewley wrote:
And now that it should be up, it looks like the updates tree is fubared for yum:
Yeah -- there's nothing there yet, including no yum metadata files saying 'nothing there', so yum is failing. Hopefully this will be fixed soon, but it'll probably be a day before all of the mirrors have what they need. Oops!
On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 07:22 -0700, David Kewley wrote:
On Monday 13 June 2005 06:37, Roozbeh Pournader wrote:
On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 09:18 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 09:16 -0400, mbneto wrote:
Are we going to see fc4 today ?
I've been checking slashdot/freshmeat/fedora.redhat.com and no sign of it.
10am EST - read the webpage.
Ah, it should be EDT, I guess. And giving times in term of UTC would always be better.
So, it's really 14:00 UTC, less than thirty minutes from now.
And now that it should be up, it looks like the updates tree is fubared for yum:
Etc. for about a dozen mirrors that I let it try.
known - being fixed upstream by pushing out some updates.
-sv
Roozbeh Pournader wrote:
On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 09:18 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 09:16 -0400, mbneto wrote:
Are we going to see fc4 today ?
I've been checking slashdot/freshmeat/fedora.redhat.com and no sign of it.
10am EST - read the webpage.
Ah, it should be EDT, I guess. And giving times in term of UTC would always be better.
I looked at 10AM EST and it wasn't there. Oh, you didn't mean Australian EST?
Spent a bit of time Googling on timezones. There's about two or three definitions of 'EST' and 'EDT' in the US alone.
Mike
http://torrent.linux.duke.edu/
On 6/13/05, mbneto mbneto@gmail.com wrote:
Are we going to see fc4 today ?
I've been checking slashdot/freshmeat/fedora.redhat.com and no sign of it.
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 09:20 -0500, Jerone Young wrote:
Better yet - the 'official' link should be: http://torrent.fedoraproject.org
-sv
On Monday 13 June 2005 22:22, seth vidal wrote:
On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 09:20 -0500, Jerone Young wrote:
Better yet - the 'official' link should be: http://torrent.fedoraproject.org
Kinda sucks to "help" when dl speed = 20 KB/s through torrent; but, a local ftp mirror = 150 KB/s. Can we use local ftp mirrors as distributed copies in bittorrent? I'm not all that conversant with the tool..
On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 23:18 +0800, Jeff Pitman wrote:
On Monday 13 June 2005 22:22, seth vidal wrote:
On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 09:20 -0500, Jerone Young wrote:
Better yet - the 'official' link should be: http://torrent.fedoraproject.org
Kinda sucks to "help" when dl speed = 20 KB/s through torrent; but, a local ftp mirror = 150 KB/s. Can we use local ftp mirrors as distributed copies in bittorrent? I'm not all that conversant with the tool..
-- -jeff
Not to be critical, but my DSL connection(1.544) is maxed out on these torrents. I am seeing close to 190KB/s coming down and I am uploading at close to 30KB/S to the torrent. Maybe you are not waiting long enough for the torrent to really get going?
Sean
On Monday 13 June 2005 23:22, Sean Bruno wrote:
On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 23:18 +0800, Jeff Pitman wrote:
Kinda sucks to "help" when dl speed = 20 KB/s through torrent; but, a local ftp mirror = 150 KB/s. Can we use local ftp mirrors as distributed copies in bittorrent? I'm not all that conversant with the tool..
Not to be critical, but my DSL connection(1.544) is maxed out on these torrents. I am seeing close to 190KB/s coming down and I am uploading at close to 30KB/S to the torrent. Maybe you are not waiting long enough for the torrent to really get going?
Been running for 33 minutes with an improvement of only 10KB/s since my last email. Does it need to go longer? (I have 8Mb DSL, should be around 500KB/s to max the line)
MRTG shows bandwidth spikes on 1:
http://symbiont.shacknet.nu/mrtg/
I feel like the pipe is saturated doing something. Not sure what. SSH is slower than dog going out (no QoS setup...). Ftp of unrelated file is down to 16KB/s. Technically, it shouldn't be.
I'm noticing this on occasion:
error(s):[23:26:33] Traceback (most recent call last): [23:42:55] Traceback (most recent call last):
I think the kashmir module is tripping up on assertion where Node != NULL or something. I don't dare restart it at this point... It's still downloading!!
Jeff Pitman wrote:
On Monday 13 June 2005 23:22, Sean Bruno wrote:
On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 23:18 +0800, Jeff Pitman wrote:
Kinda sucks to "help" when dl speed = 20 KB/s through torrent; but, a local ftp mirror = 150 KB/s. Can we use local ftp mirrors as distributed copies in bittorrent? I'm not all that conversant with the tool..
Not to be critical, but my DSL connection(1.544) is maxed out on these torrents. I am seeing close to 190KB/s coming down and I am uploading at close to 30KB/S to the torrent. Maybe you are not waiting long enough for the torrent to really get going?
Been running for 33 minutes with an improvement of only 10KB/s since my last email. Does it need to go longer? (I have 8Mb DSL, should be around 500KB/s to max the line)
MRTG shows bandwidth spikes on 1:
http://symbiont.shacknet.nu/mrtg/
I feel like the pipe is saturated doing something. Not sure what. SSH is slower than dog going out (no QoS setup...). Ftp of unrelated file is down to 16KB/s. Technically, it shouldn't be.
I'm noticing this on occasion:
error(s):[23:26:33] Traceback (most recent call last): [23:42:55] Traceback (most recent call last):
I think the kashmir module is tripping up on assertion where Node != NULL or something. I don't dare restart it at this point... It's still downloading!!
A restart may actually get you a different set of peers and better download speeds. I'd be inclined to try it myself. You'll not be starting the download again, and will just lose the "chunks" (usually 256K in size) that were in progress at the time you stopped.
Someone on fedora-list is getting the tracebacks too. Which version of bittorrent are you using, and where did you get it?
Paul.
On Tuesday 14 June 2005 00:02, Paul Howarth wrote:
Someone on fedora-list is getting the tracebacks too. Which version of bittorrent are you using, and where did you get it?
[jeff@symbiont ~]$ rpm -q python-khashmir python-khashmir-4.1.1-2.1.fc3.rf [jeff@symbiont ~]$ rpm -q bittorrent bittorrent-4.1.1-2.1.fc3.rf
Rpmforge aka dag.
Jeff Pitman wrote:
On Tuesday 14 June 2005 00:02, Paul Howarth wrote:
Someone on fedora-list is getting the tracebacks too. Which version of bittorrent are you using, and where did you get it?
[jeff@symbiont ~]$ rpm -q python-khashmir python-khashmir-4.1.1-2.1.fc3.rf [jeff@symbiont ~]$ rpm -q bittorrent bittorrent-4.1.1-2.1.fc3.rf
Rpmforge aka dag.
I have an FC3 package of BitTorrent 4.1.2 at http://www.city-fan.org/ftp/contrib/bittorrent/ which *may* address this issue (I don't know if this is one of the "many" bugs fixed upstream). My packages don't split out python-khashmir so you may need to rpm -e that package if you try mine. I'd be interested to know if this fixed the problem.
Paul.
well, seems that the http download was faster this time...
On 6/13/05, Jeff Pitman symbiont@berlios.de wrote:
On Tuesday 14 June 2005 00:30, Paul Howarth wrote:
I'd be interested to know if this fixed the problem.
It appears to have fixed it. I'm not getting the traceback any more.
thanks,
-jeff
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 11:43:49PM +0800, Jeff Pitman wrote:
Been running for 33 minutes with an improvement of only 10KB/s since my last email. Does it need to go longer? (I have 8Mb DSL, should be around 500KB/s to max the line)
Are you behind a firewall/NAT box?
http://dessent.net/btfaq/#ports
NULL or something. I don't dare restart it at this point... It's still downloading!!
If you kill it, it'll restart and keep what you've got.
On Tuesday 14 June 2005 00:03, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 11:43:49PM +0800, Jeff Pitman wrote:
Been running for 33 minutes with an improvement of only 10KB/s since my last email. Does it need to go longer? (I have 8Mb DSL, should be around 500KB/s to max the line)
Are you behind a firewall/NAT box?
Ports opened long ago.
NULL or something. I don't dare restart it at this point... It's still downloading!!
If you kill it, it'll restart and keep what you've got.
I know. 200KB/s from a local mirror is too good to pass up. Maybe I'll just seed the torrent and let it run over night (which is the day time for you guys.)
On Mon, 13 Jun 2005, Jeff Pitman wrote:
On Monday 13 June 2005 22:22, seth vidal wrote:
On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 09:20 -0500, Jerone Young wrote:
Better yet - the 'official' link should be: http://torrent.fedoraproject.org
Kinda sucks to "help" when dl speed = 20 KB/s through torrent; but, a local ftp mirror = 150 KB/s. Can we use local ftp mirrors as distributed copies in bittorrent? I'm not all that conversant with the tool..
The speed from the torrent goes up as you get farther into the download. It just requires patience.
Best, -- Elliot You can accomplish anything you want, so long as you don't care who gets credit for it.
On 6/13/05, Elliot Lee sopwith@redhat.com wrote:
The speed from the torrent goes up as you get farther into the download. It just requires patience.
Yep. Just downloaded all 5 images (~ 2.56 GB) in ~ 45 minutes, or roughly 1 MB/sec. Might have done better if I hadn't throttled the upstream (~300 kB/sec).
-David
On 6/13/05, Jeff Pitman symbiont@berlios.de wrote:
Kinda sucks to "help" when dl speed = 20 KB/s through torrent; but, a local ftp mirror = 150 KB/s. Can we use local ftp mirrors as distributed copies in bittorrent? I'm not all that conversant with the tool..
It will get faster if you have patience, eventually filling your pipe in many cases.. If you don't have patience, you can help by finishing the FTP download, stopping BT, copying the file you got via ftp on top of the file BT was writing and then start up bt again. You will now be a seed helping others.
This even works with a partial FTP download. ... and it might even work to take a FC4-test3 DVD and put it in the same place, depending on how much has changed. :)
On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 11:18:14PM +0800, Jeff Pitman wrote:
Kinda sucks to "help" when dl speed = 20 KB/s through torrent; but, a local ftp mirror = 150 KB/s. Can we use local ftp mirrors as distributed copies in bittorrent? I'm not all that conversant with the tool..
If you are an ftp mirror owner then yes, you can join the torrent giving the copy you already have and you'll become an uploader only.
Alan
I am getting errors. Is there a problem with the torrent/the tracks/my machine ?
ror(s):[17:52:35] Tracker announce still not complete 119 seconds after starting it | | [17:53:35] Tracker announce still not complete 179 seconds after starting it | | [17:53:44] Problem connecting to tracker - <urlopen error (110, 'Connection timed out')> | | [17:55:35] Tracker announce still not complete 60 seconds after starting it | | [17:56:35] Tracker announce still not complete 120 seconds after starting it | | [17:57:35] Tracker announce still not complete 180 seconds after starting it | | [17:57:44] Problem connecting to tracker - <urlopen error (110, 'Connection timed out')>
-
Alan Cox -
David Eisner -
David Kewley -
Elliot Lee -
Gregory Maxwell -
Jeff Pitman -
Jerone Young -
Matthew Miller -
mbneto -
Mike MacCana -
Paul Howarth -
Peter Robinson -
Richard June -
Roozbeh Pournader -
Sean Bruno -
seth vidal