On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 14:25:58 +0200, Michael Schwendt
<fedora(a)wir-sind-cool.org> wrote:
qt-devel (or /usr/bin/qmake, which would only break if qmake were
moved to a different bin directory).
Ok, so I guess I will stick with qt-devel.
Anyway it is somewhat
disappointing that a library NOT DEPENDING from qt will have qt-devel
as BuildRequire.
But of course, this is an upstream issue...
> 3 would make sense but I guess it will be detrimental to the package
> configurability (my chosen options will be hardcoded in the Makefile).
> Moreover, how would I deal with the additional file in the .spec??
You would either insert your prebuilt Makefile as a %patch or include
it as a %{SOURCEx} file. The ugly thing about a prebuilt Makefile most
likely will be that it contains hardcoded paths (to programs,
libraries and headers), which would increase the maintenance
requirements.
Ok, this is confirming my fears, so for now I will ignore this
option.
Thanks for your opinion