----- "Adam Williamson" awilliam@redhat.com wrote:
There actually already *is* a review point prior to moving to -updates, but it's currently owned by rel-eng and is not highly publicized, and very little gets rejected. It is there, though: rel-eng explained this earlier in the threads, and explained that they are unhappy with it being informal. I'm trying to find the post, but there's just too much to wade through, sorry :(
"Why Fedora needs an Updates Policy" from Josh Boyer:
http://jwboyer.livejournal.com/36737.html
That's why we need some defined process. That's why we need to improve current practice. That's why all those proposals appear.