On 05. 03. 20 15:21, jkonecny(a)redhat.com wrote:
Thanks for reply, see my answers inline.
On Thu, 2020-03-05 at 10:26 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 05. 03. 20 9:12, jkonecny(a)redhat.com wrote:
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> I'm co-maintaining package of kakoune and this package have failing
>> build on F32 and Rawhide because of tests.
>>
>>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1799560
>>
>> As you can see in the last comment there is an upstream bug on gcc-
>> 10
>> which is blocking the package tests.
>>
>> What I want to know is what should be my next steps right now.
>>
>> - Should I create bugzilla on Fedora side on gcc and block my bug
>> on
>> this bug?
>
> You can. You don't need to.
I'll follow Daniels answer so I'll create the bug that Fedora
maintainer of gcc, so they can look on that and know that it's blocking
my package.
That was good advice.
>> - Should I disable those tests?
>
> You can. You don't need to, unless you need to rebuild the package
> for some reason.
Isn't new gcc version requirement for rebuild?
Strictly speaking, no. Evetually, you'll need to rebuild this once. But you
don't need to make it a top priority at this moment, unless it is blocking some
other packages or an update you want or a security fix, etc...
>> - Should I wait if gcc-10 upstream will solve this issue in
time
>> for
>> F32?
>
> You can. Or they can solve it later.
Wouldn't that mean that kakoune package won't be present in F32? Maybe
I'm miss-understanding the issue here but if it won't compile with new
gcc it will have different ABI than rest of the F32 apps so it
basically can't be used there?
It is present in Fedora 32. It should work, unless the executables and shared
object files produced by gcc 10 cannot work with stuff compiled by gcc 9 (that
would be very bad).
>> - Should I propose Fedora 32 blocker because of the bug in
gcc?
>
> Why would you do that? How is Fedora 32 broken if we release it with
> kakoune not
> rebuilt yet? Is this FTBFS blocking other libraries from being
> updated as
> planned for Fedora 32?
If this is not that serious issue and it's affecting only my package
than it's fine I guess.
It is fine.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok