Am Wed, 18 Apr 2007 16:45:04 -0500
schrieb Steven Pritchard <steve(a)silug.org>:
On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 11:33:46PM +0200, Sebastian Vahl wrote:
> So the question here is: Are there good reasons for choosing
> qtparted instead of gparted? Or is gtparted equal in functionality?
I'd think sticking with qtparted to get a common(-ish) look & feel
would be best.
Don't think it's common look (maybe feel). It's pure qt :)
http://qtparted.sourceforge.net/screenshots.en.html
BTW, could someone verify that ntfs resizing actually works in the
current Fedora qtparted? It *should* be enabled, but I haven't had a
chance to actually try it yet...
That's the background for this:
http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234082
And we've also decided to include them. But when resizing ntfs is not
working with qtparted, gparted would be the only choice.
Sebastian