This is BSD + a clause:
Copyright (c) 2002 Kitware, Inc., Insight Consortium All rights reserved.
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met:
* Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
* Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
* The names of Kitware, Inc., the Insight Consortium, or the names of any consortium members, or of any contributors, may not be used to endorse or promote products derived from this software without specific prior written permission.
* Modified source versions must be plainly marked as such, and must not be misrepresented as being the original software.
So, is "BSD" a sufficient tag? My spec applies some patches, but it seems since the spec file documents this it is not being represented as the original software.
Orion Poplawski wrote:
This is BSD + a clause:
So, is "BSD" a sufficient tag? My spec applies some patches, but it seems since the spec file documents this it is not being represented as s th the original software.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing
"BSD with advertising" is the correct tag.
Rahul
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Orion Poplawski wrote:
This is BSD + a clause:
So, is "BSD" a sufficient tag? My spec applies some patches, but it seems since the spec file documents this it is not being represented as s th the original software.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing
"BSD with advertising" is the correct tag.
Rahul
No, it doesn't include the third "advertising" clause:
- All advertising materials mentioning features or use of this software must display the following acknowledgement: This product includes software developed by the University of California, Berkeley and its contributors.
On Tue, 2007-08-21 at 14:20 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
So, is "BSD" a sufficient tag? My spec applies some patches, but it seems since the spec file documents this it is not being represented as the original software.
BSD is fine. The spec is plainly marking the modifications.
~spot