Hi there,
Is there any plan to have the EKOPath compiler, from PathScale, shipped as part of the future Fedora releases?
It doesn't necessarily mean having Fedora's packages built with it, but merely packaging it as a first step.
Any thoughts?
-Ilyes
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Ilyes Gouta ilyes.gouta@gmail.com wrote:
Hi there,
Is there any plan to have the EKOPath compiler, from PathScale, shipped as part of the future Fedora releases?
It doesn't necessarily mean having Fedora's packages built with it, but merely packaging it as a first step.
Any thoughts?
Well assuming no legal issues anyone can package it and submit it for review ...
Well assuming no legal issues anyone can package it and submit it for review ...
I do know that SLES and RH releases are being worked on. It should also become available for Scientific Linux too at some point.
-Ilyes
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 1:23 PM, drago01 drago01@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Ilyes Gouta ilyes.gouta@gmail.com wrote:
Hi there,
Is there any plan to have the EKOPath compiler, from PathScale, shipped as part of the future Fedora releases?
It doesn't necessarily mean having Fedora's packages built with it, but merely packaging it as a first step.
Any thoughts?
Well assuming no legal issues anyone can package it and submit it for review ...
devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Ilyes Gouta ilyes.gouta@gmail.com wrote:
Well assuming no legal issues anyone can package it and submit it for review ...
I do know that SLES and RH releases are being worked on. It should also become available for Scientific Linux too at some point.
So?
You (or anyone else) is still free to just package it.
You (or anyone else) is still free to just package it.
Sure. I'm trying to put together an initial spec file for Fedora.
-Ilyes
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 1:36 PM, drago01 drago01@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Ilyes Gouta ilyes.gouta@gmail.com wrote:
Well assuming no legal issues anyone can package it and submit it for review ...
I do know that SLES and RH releases are being worked on. It should also become available for Scientific Linux too at some point.
So?
You (or anyone else) is still free to just package it.
devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Sat, 13 Aug 2011 16:42:13 +0200 Björn Persson bjorn@xn--rombobjrn-67a.se wrote:
Ilyes Gouta wrote:
I'm trying to put together an initial spec file for Fedora.
According to PathScale's license document their products are partly free and partly unfree. You can of course only package the free parts. How useful are they without the unfree parts?
Björn Persson
http://www.pathscale.com/ekopath4-open-source-announcement June 13th, 2011
"PathScale announced today that the EKOPath 4 Compiler Suite is now available as an open source project and free download for Linux, FreeBSD and Solaris. This release includes documentation and the complete development stack, including compiler, debugger, assembler, runtimes and standard libraries. EKOPath is the product of years of ongoing development, representing one of the industries highest performance Intel 64 and AMD C, C++ and Fortran compilers."
The sources seem to be available at https://github.com/path64
The compiler part is GPLv3, the debugger is CDDL. I tried to get the compiler packaged for a few hours, but ran into some problems in the build phase; the compiler segfaulted in the bootstrap phase. This was on Fedora 15. My spec file is attached, maybe someone can get it to build.
We should also target and package a clearly stated and defined (features) version of the compiler, that has been tested and validated.
-Ilyes
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Jussi Lehtola jussilehtola@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Sat, 13 Aug 2011 16:42:13 +0200 Björn Persson bjorn@xn--rombobjrn-67a.se wrote:
Ilyes Gouta wrote:
I'm trying to put together an initial spec file for Fedora.
According to PathScale's license document their products are partly free and partly unfree. You can of course only package the free parts. How useful are they without the unfree parts?
Björn Persson
http://www.pathscale.com/ekopath4-open-source-announcement June 13th, 2011
"PathScale announced today that the EKOPath 4 Compiler Suite is now available as an open source project and free download for Linux, FreeBSD and Solaris. This release includes documentation and the complete development stack, including compiler, debugger, assembler, runtimes and standard libraries. EKOPath is the product of years of ongoing development, representing one of the industries highest performance Intel 64 and AMD C, C++ and Fortran compilers."
The sources seem to be available at https://github.com/path64
The compiler part is GPLv3, the debugger is CDDL. I tried to get the compiler packaged for a few hours, but ran into some problems in the build phase; the compiler segfaulted in the bootstrap phase. This was on Fedora 15. My spec file is attached, maybe someone can get it to build. -- Jussi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussilehtola@fedoraproject.org
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel