On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 7:37 AM, Stephen Gallagher sgallagh@redhat.com wrote:
On 04/06/2016 04:49 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> "PP" == Petr Pisar ppisar@redhat.com writes:
PP> This changes meaning regarding to F25. Previous text banned rich PP> strong dependencies in F24 only. This current text extends the ban PP> to all Fedoras.
PP> Is that intentional?
It's currently correct according to FESCo's request as I understood it. While f25 might still be able to compose, if the tools aren't fixed before the next branch then we'll have to back things out or end up back in a situation where we can't mash updates.
I'd say it's fine for now. Our *hope* is that we will be able to support them for F25 at some point, but composes *right now* probably don't work, so I think this wording is fine.
So you don't expect that mash could be fixed/replaced before the F24 release in June, then?