On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 10:30 PM, Adam Williamson
<adamwill(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
On Mon, 2016-04-18 at 15:11 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> Hi Jan,
>
> Looking at the schedule[1] today I am confused by one thing, Fedora policy
> states that any slip pushes out all other milestones. which would mean Beta
> Freeze is next week not this week.
>
> Dennis
>
>
> [1]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/24/Schedule
Er. Yes. That's a point.
I tend to just take it on faith that the schedules get adjusted after
slips, but AFAICS, the F24 schedule was not adjusted after the Alpha
slip.
https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Releases/24/Schedule&diff...
is when the wiki schedule was adjusted for the Alpha slip, but the only
date that was changed was the Alpha release date, no other dates were
touched.
As things stand it's possible we could make the non-adjusted Beta
dates, though there's some missing test coverage we'd really need to
get to, but it's definitely not what we've done before without an
explicit decision to *not* change the later dates.
I have only changed the Alpha release date and intentionally have left
the Beta and Final the same. This has been communicated to Marketing,
unfortunately (my fault) not to rel-eng nor QA. The reason was mainly
not to affect F25.
Is it acceptable to have Beta & Final release dates for F24 as stated
on [1], or we really need to slip these dates ?
[1]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/24/Schedule
Regards,
Jan
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
--
Jan Kuřík
Platform & Fedora Program Manager
Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkynova 99/71, 612 45 Brno, Czech Republic