On Sat, 2011-03-12 at 12:54 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Bruno Wolff III <bruno(a)wolff.to> writes:
> lordsawar has a gfdl manual that is installed. Does that need to be reflected
> in the license tag such that it should be GPLv2+ and GFDL1.1+, instead of
> just GPLv2+?
legal(a)lists.fedoraproject.org would be the right place to ask that,
but I'm pretty sure the answer you'll get is "yes".
You could possibly split the manual into a documentation subpackage
with its own License: tag if you wanted to keep the license tags clear.
FWIW, when I have a package with a complex licensing case, I usually
stick a comment in the spec explaining exactly what stuff is under each
license.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net