2014-10-21 16:39 GMT+02:00 Máirín Duffy <duffy(a)fedoraproject.org>:
On 10/21/2014 09:36 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 08:28:16AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>>
>> A few specific comments that have been made on the Board ticket (to
>> avoid rehashing them).
>>
>> * "Fedora Server 21" sounds like we've had 21 releases of Fedora
Server
>> and we certainly haven't.
>> * Should we start all of the Products at version 1 and say "built on the
>> Fedora 21 platform"?
>
>
> My opinion is that since we've decided on a unified lifecycle and
> release process for now, we should reflect that in the names, so:
>
> Fedora 21 Cloud
> Fedora 21 Server
> Fedora 21 Workstation
>
> but that we should also allow unversioned naming:
>
> Fedora Cloud
> Fedora Server
> Fedora Workstation
>
> In the future, if we have separated release cycles, I think separate
> numbering might make sense, with the "Built on the Fedora 21 platform"
> wording or similar. Possibily date-based schemes for the products —
> but I don't want to get the cart too far ahead of the horse on that.
^^^ This
From my POV (the designer / branding person,) this is exactly the plan I
support.
Amen
This is a fair compromise between having a consistent numbering and a
strong product branding.
H.