Adam Jackson (ajax(a)redhat.com) said:
On 4/13/11 5:14 AM, Phil Knirsch wrote:
> On 04/12/2011 06:12 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
>> ast, ati, cirrus, fbdev, geode, intel, mga, nouveau, openchrome,
>> qxl, sis/xgi, vesa, vmware
>
> Would this affect the way KVM and specifically qemu-kvm in it's default
> setup for video using the cirrus driver would work? Just wondering if
> there would be any implications for the virt guys in that regard.
"cirrus" is in that list for precisely that reason.
... should we work on making qemu/kvm default to something more modern/sane?
(qxl, vmware?) Does it not end up mattering (or do we need cirrus for
legacy OS support)?
Bill