On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 18:01:31 +0100
"Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Merely reporting rpmlint output after every build isn't going to
be
too scalable, because there can be alot of noise in its output. What
we really need is to compare the new rpmlint output to the rpmlint
output of the previous build in that build target. So that we only
see 'differences' & thus can easily spot regressions. You can extend
this to other RPM semantics comparisons beyond just rpmlints, so we
can do better at spotting regressions in Fedora updates automatically.
And would we call this magical thing "rpmdiff" 'cause that would be
awesome...
If only there were some opensource software that did this.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?