On 11 February 2013 07:15, Casey Dahlin cdahlin@redhat.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 11:34:34AM +0000, Ian Malone wrote:
Gnome 2 slowly returned to the old behaviour in many ways. Gnome 3 is starting to do this.
As someone who, I presume, does not like Gnome 3, and as someone who, I will wildly guess, shares the notion that GNOME devs are doing whatever they want and not listening to your use cases...
...are you certain...
...absolutely certain...
...that you'd like to be on record setting the precedent that GNOME 3 is admitting failure by compromising to your standards?
On record? Is there going to be a trial? What frustrates me is it's such an uphill battle. Step 1: Everything changes. Step 2: Users protest, some leave. Step 3: Supporters respond there's nothing wrong and essentially everyone who doesn't like it is too stupid or lazy. Step 4: Users carry on complaining. Step 5: Some features are gradually re-added, without ever acknowledging there was a problem in the first place. Step 6: Minor release? Go to step 4. Step 7: Major release? Go to step 5.