Le mercredi 24 octobre 2018 à 08:42 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot a écrit :
Le mercredi 24 octobre 2018 à 00:52 +0200, Robert-André Mauchin a écrit :
On mardi 23 octobre 2018 23:47:05 CEST you wrote:
On mardi 23 octobre 2018 22:43:16 CEST Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Anyway, since no one answers when I list the possible fixes and ask to choose between them, I fixed the Fedora spec files myself.
Feel free to reintroduce %gosetup calls if you really want them, once the %gosetup implementation has been fixed.
Thanks for doing but you messed up the bumping of all the %changelog entries.
Used this Fish script to fix my SPEC:
This does not need any fixing, it may not be the changelog format you're used to, but it's one of the changelog styles rpm understands, which is used by packages in Fedora, and which was documented at one point in guidelines (no idea where the corresponding paragraph is today with the doc.fedoraproject changes)
Concretely the
* <date> <name> <mail> - version-release - changes
format is a tad more flexible and allows publishing several fixes in a row without duplicating date lines
* <date> <name> <mail> - version-release - changes - version-release - changes
and so on
And, our infra does not care if a changelog uses mixed style or not, since mass rebuilds will drop changelog entries in a single format in all Fedora specs, so you have many mixed style changelogs in the distribution today.
(of course it's your specs, you can rewrite changelog entries any way that makes you feel better)
Regards,