On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 19:10 +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 11:57:10AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 14:24 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote:
Chuck Anderson wrote:
How did you find that? I was looking for it, but couldn't find it linked from anywhere.
It's linked, at least, in the word "Status" at the bottom of each bug, next to the drop-down where you would set the status.
[snip]
Possibly the clearest thing to do would just be to use the same flow RHEL uses, even if the names would be a bit odd for Fedora (since we don't really have 'Errata' for Fedora releases). Otherwise, the Fedora flow should at least be clearly defined somewhere, and explained on that page in Bugzilla.
The Fedora bug flow is defined here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/BugStatusWorkFlow
Although it is lacking clear guidelines on the choice of sub-state for the CLOSED state. That just requires a little docs work on the wiki.
Hehe. I was actually going to link to that page and then didn't, for two reasons:
1) as you say, it fudges the CLOSED resolutions anyway 2) it's being revised (we're working on it today) since NEEDINFO isn't a status these days.