On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 09:49:14AM -0700, Per Bjornsson wrote:
On Tue, 2005-05-10 at 12:28 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Michael Schroeder (mls@suse.de) said:
Why not /usr/share/xscreensaver if they are arch independent?
/usr/share is for files that can run on any architecture. These are files that can be archtecture-specific, but don't have to be.
Yes, but would it actually hurt (well, apart from the work of changing the packaging) to have them live in /usr/lib/xscreensaver instead of /usr/libexec/xscreensaver?
Yes, it would (a little). Assume you write an xscreensaver hack in Python, naturally resulting in a noarch package. Now the package will have to contain both /usr/lib/xscreensaver/pythonhack and /usr/lib64/xscreensaver/pythonhack. Mirek