On Mon, 2007-09-17 at 14:04 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
On Mon, 2007-09-17 at 13:49 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Jesse Keating (jkeating(a)redhat.com) said:
> > I was thinking about this over the weekend. We have "shutdown"
> > sections in services so that you can restart a service while running,
> > however we don't necessarily have to "shut down" the services
when we
> > shut down the system.
>
> Right, and not doing it cuts shutdown in half. However, since it's a
> change in interface, you'd have to tag each service that you don't care
> about shutting down separately. Which sucks.
>
would this be as a simple as modifying chkconfig so that if there isn't
a 3rd field in the:
# chkconfig: levels start_order stop_order
line in an initscript that it just didn't make the stop symlink?
Doesn't this potentially interfere with un-mounting file systems?
So we always kill -9 em?
Simo.