2009/11/4 Steve Traylen <steve.traylen(a)cern.ch>:
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Rudolf Kastl <che666(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> 2009/11/4 Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs(a)math.uh.edu>:
>>>>>>> "ST" == Steve Traylen <steve.traylen(a)cern.ch>
writes:
>>
>> ST> Would be happy for an alternatives solution. I have yet another
>> ST> /usr/bin/qstat for a POSIX interface to batch on the way at some
>> ST> point.
>>
>> Turns out that the other queuing systems (torque and gridengine) have
>> already renamed their qstat binaries (to qstat-torque and qstat-ge). I
>> would expect that other queuing packages should do the same.
>
Yes a qstat-slurm with qstat as alternative across them.
Good news.
but then the alternatives qstat conflicts with /usr/bin/qstat from
the qstat rpm package, doesent it?
kind regards,
Rudolf Kastl
> that means that the conflict tags in the qemu and the torque-clients
> package are invalid.
>
> thanks for checking jason!
>
> kind regards,
> Rudolf Kastl
>>
>> - J<
>>
>> --
>> fedora-devel-list mailing list
>> fedora-devel-list(a)redhat.com
>>
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
>>
>
> --
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list(a)redhat.com
>
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
>
--
Steve Traylen
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list