On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 8:35 PM Sébastien Le Roux sebastien.leroux@ipcms.unistra.fr wrote:
Le 28/09/2022 à 20:13, Alexander Ploumistos a écrit :
Yes I did look into this documents today, followed the procedure, and submitted the bugzilla:
I'm preparing for an interview with the CNRS these days, but if nobody else turns up, I will do the review.
About what I understand the first thing is to find a sponsor, and I hope what I provided is enough, please let me know if you think that I missed something, I would correct it ASAP.
I've set the FE-NEEDSPONSOR flag to your review request, it should help with that.
In the meantime, you could add this to your reading list: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Packager_sponsor_policy/ It could give you some pointers as to what you could do to get sponsored, e.g. unofficial reviews.
However I wasn't able to understand how to provide a 'koji' build, I can build the package using 'fedpkg' (local) but not sure how both relate ...
It's in the "Scratch Builds" section of this document (they're quickly piling up, I know…): https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Using_the_Koji_Buil... Essentially, you do a scratch build of your package in Rawhide and if it is successful, you post the link to your review request.
Eventually, you might be interested in joining the Sci-Tech SIG, it's more than likely that we maintain some package you might be using and more hands are always welcome: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:SciTech_SIG
Sure, but I would need a proper training before that ;-)
There are quite a few chemistry-related packages that could use more love. I think you are more than qualified to lend a hand in many of them, should the need occur.