On 7/19/19 11:33 AM, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote:
On Fri, 19 Jul 2019 at 05:09, Zdenek Dohnal zdohnal@redhat.com wrote:
On 7/18/19 9:47 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
>> "ZD" == Zdenek Dohnal zdohnal@redhat.com writes:
ZD> Hi all, I would like to ask as Vim co-maintainer, do you find useful ZD> for Vim to do:
ZD> - when you open new file with .spec suffix, Vim will get you basic ZD> spec file structure?
Personally I have always found that behavior annoying. If I open a new file, I expect that the file would be empty. If I want a template, I can copy one. Editing a new HTML file doesn't bring up a template for HTML files, for example.
The spec template used isn't something I ever want anyway. It uses tabs instead of spaces and uses them in a way that implies that indentation is somehow required.
Converted to spaces now.
And it includes a default release tag of "0%{?dist}" which isn't permitted by the packaging guidelines.
Expected. It is designed for user to run rpmdev-bumpspec <package>.spec, so the tool will supply correct format of changelog entry and increment the release.
Why would you use rpmdev-bumpspec for a file created in vim when you can use <leader>c in vim directly?
It also creates a changelog entry for you.