On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 2:23 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon <pingou(a)pingoured.fr>
wrote:
On Sat, Oct 19, 2019 at 05:42:02PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 19, 2019 at 05:49:18PM +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 19, 2019 at 03:52:03PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 02:09:14PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > > >
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/OnDemandSideTags
> > >
> > > Nice idea. Maybe I missed it, but I didn't see in the proposal if
> > > there would be guidelines for naming the side tags so they don't
> > > interfere with each other?
> > >
> > > For OCaml rebuilds they have been called ‘fNN-ocaml’ (NN = fedora
> > > version), except where we needed to do further rebuilds in which case
> > > we used ‘fNN-ocaml2’ etc.
> >
> > Good suggestion. I think even something like
<fas-id>/<fNN>-<package>[-<something>]
> > could be a way to avoid accidental conflicts.
>
> The already implemented koji sidetag plugin and fedpkg integration lets
> this be free-form, but you can search / list them by owner as well.
>
> So, yeah, fNN-something-descriptive would be good, and if you wanted to
> coordinate you can list the user and ask them.
The format adopted for rawhide gating is:
fXX-build-side-YYYY where both X and Y are integers.
Allowing arbitrary words in the side-tag names may results in security
issues,
cf:
https://pagure.io/fedpkg/issue/329#comment-583078
The comment was only about usernames. I still think we need descriptive
text so at least the purpose of the side tag is clear.
Thanks,
Richard