On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs(a)math.uh.edu> wrote:
>>>>> "RK" == Rudolf Kastl
<che666(a)gmail.com> writes:
RK> 2. qstat and torque-client both provide a qstat binary... is there
RK> anything done to get that resolved upstream? or is it a "conflicts
RK> and forget" scenario?
This one, I think, should be easily resolvable with alternatives.
Would be happy for an alternatives solution. I have yet another
/usr/bin/qstat for a POSIX interface to batch on the way at some point.
Actually I think all but a small number of the currently conflicting
packages could be fixed up pretty easily. Currently it doesn't seem
that there's any sort of enforcement outside of the original package
review.
The way around this is, of course, for someone to spend some time
generating the current list of conflicting packages, proposing
solutions, and working with FESCo in the case that those solutions are
not applied.
- J<
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
--
Steve Traylen